IdeaM · Review Writer

Live — in Build ▸ Review Writer

Review Writer — a literature review grounded in real papers.

Ask a research question. IdeaM searches the open scholarly record, gathers the papers that matter, and writes a fully cited first draft straight into your outline — where you shape it into your own.

Today

Hours of manual searching

Database after database, chasing PDFs, copying references by hand, and starting the writing with a blank page.

With Review Writer

A cited draft in your outline

The papers found, read and weighed question by question — a bottom line, an evidence table and a verdict for each question, with every reference attached — ready for you to reorganise and rewrite.

How it works — eight steps

  1. 01Gather

    Ask

    Your research question, the field, the years to cover, and the kind of review: narrative, systematic-style or scoping.

  2. 02Gather

    Search

    Free, open scholarly databases — OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, Crossref, PubMed / Europe PMC and arXiv. Together, hundreds of millions of papers with abstracts and citation counts.

  3. 03Gather

    Find free full text

    Unpaywall, PubMed Central and arXiv point to legal open-access copies — PubMed Central is looked up from the DOI when an index missed it — so the reading goes beyond the abstract wherever it can.

  4. 04You decide

    You choose

    The candidate papers land in your outline, one item per paper. Delete the ones you don't want before a word is written — the review is built only on the papers you keep.

  5. 05Write

    Read

    Full text where it is open, the abstract otherwise — and each paper is marked with which, so you always know what the writing rests on.

  6. 06Write

    Write

    An evidence table, then one argument by question — each weighed by study design and size, disagreements explained, a verdict with a confidence rating — opening with a bottom line, written into your outline where every section can be reorganised and rewritten.

  7. 07Check

    Verify

    Every citation must match a paper actually retrieved. DOIs are re-checked, and anything unmatched is removed.

  8. 08Deliver

    Deliver

    A formatted PDF with title page, abstract and references, plus a BibTeX / RIS file for your citation manager.

Every citation is a real paper.

AI writers are known for inventing references. Review Writer works the other way round: it can only cite what it actually retrieved, so every reference in the draft points to a paper you can open and read.

Where the papers come from

Open scholarly infrastructure, built by the research community — hundreds of millions of papers with abstracts and citation counts.

OpenAlex

An open catalogue of the world's research, across every field.

Semantic Scholar

Papers with abstracts, citation counts and who-cites-whom.

Crossref

The registry behind DOIs — how each reference is re-checked.

PubMed / Europe PMC

Biomedical and life-sciences literature, much of it in full text.

arXiv

Preprints in physics, mathematics, computing and more.

Unpaywall

Finds the legal, free full-text copy of a paper wherever one exists.

Three kinds of review, one finished package

Choose the review type

  • NarrativeA readable synthesis of what a field knows and where it is heading.
  • Systematic-styleA structured search and screening, reported with its numbers.
    Found→Screened→Included
  • ScopingA map of how much research exists on a topic, and where the gaps are.

What you take away

  • The draft, in your outlineEvery question a branch you can move, merge, expand or rewrite, beside the evidence table.
  • A formatted PDFTitle page, abstract, a bottom line with a summary-of-findings table, the evidence table, the review itself and a full reference list.
  • A citation fileBibTeX and RIS, ready for Zotero, EndNote or Mendeley.
  • The paper trailFor systematic-style reviews, the found, screened and included counts.

A real excerpt

Written by IdeaM from one research question — unedited first draft; every citation is a real paper

“Compared with no intervention or usual care, intermittent fasting lowers fasting glucose at 6 months (high confidence) [1, 2]. Compared with no intervention or usual care, intermittent fasting has inconsistent effects on HbA1c over 3–6 months (moderate confidence) [1, 3, 4].”
“Specifically, when comparing IF against an active alternative, one randomised controlled trial demonstrated a benefit when comparing 5:2 MR against metformin and empagliflozin [5], whereas another randomised controlled trial comparing an intermittent energy restriction diet to a continuous energy restriction diet found no difference in HbA1c [9].”
Download the full sample review (PDF, 17 pages, 19 cited papers)

Who it's for

Grad studentsThe literature chapter of a thesis or dissertation.
ResearchersGetting up to speed fast in a new or neighbouring area.
CliniciansWhat the published evidence says about a question from practice.
AnalystsEvidence briefs that cite their sources properly.
Grant writersBackground and significance sections, fully referenced.
A strong, fully cited first draft — that you shape. The search, the reading and the referencing are done; the thinking, the judgement and the final word stay yours.